Proven Science
MindStreams® research has been clinically validated by 46 full length peer-reviewed articles involving a total of over 3,500 patients to date in 159 research studies. Also, over 100 conference abstracts, of which 77 were from unique studies, have been presented at international meetings. No other clinical computerized cognitive testing service has as much clinical scientific substantiation.
-
Normative Scoring (for age and education)
MindStreams® utilizes a proprietary research quality data base of over 1,500 healthy individuals (ages 9-95) to generate results for your clinical and research needs.
Precision
MindStreams® provides accuracy at least as good as for paper-based tests, and added features such as measurement of reaction times, adaptive testing, and multiple alternate forms represent scientific advances. This added precision allows you to detect even very mild cognitive impairment, enabling early intervention.
Easily Track Patients
MindStreams® offers high test-retest reliability and is easy to re-administer, making it ideal for tracking longitudinal changes in your patients’ disease management over time.
Medical Technician-Administrable
MindStreams® can be easily administered by a technician on your staff (MindStreams® will train this person). An expert professional must perform the interpretation.
Favorable Reimbursement
Neuropsycholgical testing codes are well established and cover technician face-to-face testing, as well as report interpretation and reporting.
Practicality
We designed MindStreams® to work in the “real” world and ensure that accurate data are gathered. For example, our systems automatically determine whether a patient has adequately mastered the “mouse” buttons, and has adequate visual acuity and color recognition to perform the tests, and offers practice sessions before each test. Most patients report that MindStreams® is easy to use.
|
Proven Science: “…MindStreams® outcomes parameters across multiple cognitive domains significantly discriminated among MCI and healthy elderly with considerable effect sizes, P<0.05…”
|
